
Disputes involving child custody oftentimes prove to be some of the most contentious aspects of divorce, separation, and paternity cases in the United States. There is some variation in the laws governing child custody from one state to another. With that noted, all 50 states generally utilize the same standard when determining child custody issues. This guideline for determining custody is known as the best interests of a child standard.

The best interest of a child standard necessitate a specific consideration of a variety of factors unique to a particular situation in which custody is an issue. The best interests of a child standard do not take a cookie-cutter or one size fits approach to custodial determinations.
As mentioned, the best interests of a child standard are applied on a case-by-case basis. There are some more commonplace standards that are utilized by a court in applying the best interests of the child standard in making custodial decisions. These include:
There is a public policy preference for parents to be able to come to an agreement when it comes to issues surrounding custody of minor children. In many divorce, separation, and even paternity proceedings, the parties are able to reach an agreement in regard to child custody.
The laws in all 50 states require a court to approve a custody agreement reached between parties before it becomes the order in a case. A judge will review a custody agreement reached between parents to ensure that it is in the best interests of a child subject to the court proceedings.

In some cases, input from the child that is subject to a custody proceeding is considered by a judge. Generally speaking, a child’s preference is not absolutely determinative in a custody case but can be significantly persuasive.
States laws do vary in regard to how a child’s input impacts custodial decision-making. The most common practice is for a court to consider the preference of an older child when it comes to custodial placement in a divorce, separation, or paternity case. The maturity level of a child is also taken into consideration when it comes to that’s child preference in regard to custodial placement.
The day may come when a desire or need arises to change custody. When a change of custody is desired or needed, the best interests of a child standard comes into play in the same manner as it does when custody is being established.
If the desire to change custody is disputed, a hearing typically is held before the court. The parent desiring to change custody must demonstrate to the court that the alteration in a custodial order is in the best interests of a child or children.
If parents have a mutual desire to change a custody arrangement, their plan must obtain approval from the court. A judge must review the proposal to ascertain whether or not it is in the best interests of a child or children.
On a concluding note, public policy and the laws of each state maintain that stability is in the best interests of a child when it comes to custody. For that reason, changes in child custody cannot occur in a haphazard or even unnecessarily frequent manner. In addition to applying the best interests of a child standard, a court also considers whether there has been some sort of material change since the last custody order that supports an alteration in an existing custodial arrangement.
For more information on child custody and Attorney Aida Rojas-Moore click here to view our YouTube Channel.
Click here to subscribe to our YouTube Channel.
Client Intake
Información del cliente en Español
Fields Marked With An ” *” Are Required